You know how you can tell that, as of November 6, 2018, we’ve entered the Millennial age of American politics? There were no losers. Everybody got a trophy.
As of the following morning, there was still no firm count of exactly how many House of Representatives and Senate seats would be claimed by each party, but it was clear that the Democrats would claw back the majority in the lower chamber while the Republicans would pad their majority in the upper.
Democrats who expected a “blue wave” were disappointed. While eking out a majority, they flipped only about two-thirds as many House seats as they might have. Even so, they achieved their goal with some room to spare and they now hold the federal purse strings, since all funding bills originate in the House.
The Republicans are more than consoled by their success in Senate races. They were widely expected to improve their majority by a seat or two, but it looks like the First Tuesday of November treated them especially well this year. We’re still waiting for final results from such battlegrounds as Florida, where the seat is poised to shift from blue to red, and Arizona, a longstanding Republican redoubt that was liable to fall to a Democratic siege. GOP candidates are in the lead in these two races but, even if they lose all them both, they’d still lay claim to the same majority they have today. This means that President Trump will have little difficulty getting his cabinet, judicial and diplomatic appointees approved – and that, even if a Democratic House should impeach him, the Republican Senate is unlikely to convict and remove him.
The biggest surprises, though, were in the gubernatorial races. The Democrats really had no business winning in Kansas, and yet they did, while also picking up mansions in Illinois, Maine, Nevada and New Mexico. Wisconsin and Michigan – the states that put candidate Trump over the top two years ago – will also be redecorating their executive offices from red to blue. And yet the Republicans held onto the biggest prize, Florida.
It’s really tempting at this point to talk about what the 2018 midterms mean for the world, the president or the American soul, but all that is beyond our brief. It also bears mentioning – and celebrating – that more female candidates ran for and won election this month than ever before in our nation’s history. Still, let’s stay focused on what this means for your investment portfolio.
Uncle Sam stands for the government, but the personification of America has always been Columbia, shown here in a 1917 poster by Paul Stahr. Credit: National Archives
Looking forward
Need we say, with the 2016 election still fresh in our minds, that prognostication is a dangerous business? We’re reminded of the words of 20th century American philosopher Lawrence Peter Berra: “It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future.”
Whatever you have to say Yogi Berra, shown here in 1953, already said it better. Credit: Bowman Gum
Essentially, there are three questions that need to be addressed:
How will the results affect different asset classes?
How will the results affect different industrial sectors?
To what extent were the results predictable and, thus, already valued by the market?
The conventional wisdom is that Democratic victories tend to favor bonds over stocks, but that’s not turning out to be the case. Equities surged in the wake of the 2018 midterms, while Treasury yields fell.
Even so, CNBC reports some bond traders believe that “a split Congress could stall plans for further tax cuts or major spending. That, in turn, could be a modest boon for bonds prices, which have come under pressure thanks to historic deficit spending and debt issuance from the Treasury Department.”
As for sector analysis, healthcare stocks were the immediate beneficiaries of the Democratic victory for control of the House, but there was little else in the way of industry-specific interest in the short run. As for the long run, we aren’t convinced of the wisdom of playing the sector game based on any election cycle’s political winds.
And, as we’ve already stated, the actual results varied from those predicted by polls only by degree and by the outcomes of individual races – the overarching net-net was directionally similar to what had been forecast for weeks. So both the stock and bond market have had ample time to factor these predictions into valuations of these financial assets.
Even so, equity markets cheered the November 6 results.
“’Gridlock is good’ is an oft-heard mantra when it comes to stocks,” MarketWatch reports. “It comes from the notion that the likely inability of lawmakers and the president to accomplish much means politicians won’t be able to do much harm nor to undo market-lifting measures already in place.”
The historical view
Markets are, generally speaking, indifferent to the results of midterm elections.
Historically, the October-through-September period surrounding a midterm has been the best 12 months for markets over the course of a presidential term. Still, the gains appear to be independent of partisan outcomes.
Little has changed since, so it should be no surprise that the S&P was up 1.5% at noon the day after the 2018 midterm. On Election Day itself, the index moved up 0.5% while the polls were open and nothing was certain.
So the real victor was the market economy and the institutions of a democratically elected federal republic. Those who feared that Donald Trump’s personal style is injurious to America’s body politic might yet be proved right, but it’s clear now that such injuries won’t be fatal. Those who believed the rhetoric about the Democratic agenda’s supposed hostility to economic prosperity and the rule of law can now take their arguments up with the entirety of the U.S. equity markets.
In short, as far as your investments are concerned, November 6 was just another day at the office. And we wouldn’t have it any other way.
Is Your Card Up To Date?
Is your credit card about to expire? Have you recently received a new card? It’s easy to update your CREDIT CARD information. Just call us at 717-569-8162, or go to the Update Credit Card Information section under the Member’s Tab.
US Economy
Third-quarter gross domestic product growth exceeded expectations, at least according to the first read. The Commerce Department estimates the U.S. economy grew at a 3.5% annualized pace, a slight outperformance of the 3.4% forecast of economists surveyed by Dow Jones. Objectively, a 3.5% GDP increase is outstanding for a developed economy, so let’s not quibble about it representing a slowdown from the 4.1% growth reported in 2Q. Increased consumer spending – likely a byproduct of high consumer confidence and lower-than-expected inflation – outdueled the fear of the effects of a trade war. Those who claimed that 3Q would be below trend because export sales were moved up in advance of announced tariffs have apparently lost the argument.
US Stocks
The S&P 500 retreated 6.84% on a total-returns basis in October, but it would have been far worse if not for a surge the last two days of the month. Even so, it gave back most – but not all – of the second quarter’s impressive 7.7% gain.
The CBOE VIX index, which measures market volatility, sharply reversed trend. At the end of October, it stood above 21. That suggests that investors were 75% more nervous about the stock market than they were 30 days before.
International
In Europe, stocks moved more or less in tandem with the American markets. Britain’s FTSE 100 lost 5.1% of its value in October, while Germany’s DAX index gave back 6.6%.
And that was the good news. Asian markets were hit even harder, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 dropping 10.6%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng 8.5% and Shanghai’s SSE Composite 7.7%.
One final point, and it’s a big one: Whether or not a global trade war ensues, stock investors seem to be arriving at a consensus that peak earnings have arrived or already passed. We can’t stress this strongly enough: International trade is a major driver of the world economy, but hardly the only one. Financial services – as well as the rest of the service sector – remain an indelible factor. And even the staunchest supply-sider must concede the critical role that demand plays. The consumer is, has been and always will be king.
Central Banks
The Federal Reserve Board, despite being labeled “crazy” by President Trump, is very much a creature of the same chief executive. As we reported here, #45 picked a qualified panel of eminent technocrats with a breadth of academic and business experience, whose steady hands will remain at the American economy’s rudder well into #46’s and #47’s terms.
And the Fed governors continue to go about their workaday business despite criticism from the Oval. In addition to slowly but steadily unwinding its mammoth balance sheet and increasing target interest rates, the Fed recently indicated that it will ease liquidity and compliance requirements on midsized lenders. Both the Fed and the European Central Bank have taken passes on raising rates in November.
Commodities
Oil prices dropped as West Texas crude reversed course and plunged almost 11% in October to $65/barrel. There were likely both seasonal and news-specific causes, that is, the dip in travel between summer vacations and winter holidays, and the realization that the sanctions against Iran would have less impact than initially believed.
Meantime, gold rose a modest 1.6% to $1,215 per troy ounce.
Despite stock volatility in both Tokyo and New York, the currencies kept pace, with the yen losing only a fractional amount in October, closing at 113 to the dollar. After a monthlong rollercoaster ride, the British pound lost 2.1% of its dollar-denominated value while the euro dropped 2.6%.
Bitcoin didn’t trade much differently than the pound or euro in October, losing 3.2% against the dollar over the course of a month with high day-to-day volatility.
Trading Restriction Reminder!
Your 401k plan has trading restrictions, so you must keep track of your buy and sell orders.
Fear & Greed Index
As of 11/12/2018
Bull Bear Oscillator vs. S&P 500 Index
This month’s models are now available to subscribers. If you are interested in becoming an Airline subscriber, click here or please contact us at 1-717-569-8162 or email us at airways@uspfa.org.
From the Captain's Table
Strategizing for the late innings
With baseball post-season just a wistful memory away, we wanted to make the analogy of how a manager of a tight game might change strategies, bringing in a new pitcher to protect a narrow lead or putting in unheralded bench players to use “small ball” tactics to manufacture a much-needed run.
But then Steve Pearce swatted a two-run homer in the first inning of the decisive Game 5, and Boston went on with a no-looking-back 5-1 victory over the Los Angeles Dodgers.
So what does that mean to us – aside from another reason to hate the Red Sox?
Somewhere out in the Great Beyond, these Dodger fans share their descendants’ 2018 heartbreak. Credit: North Brooklyn History Blog (historicgreenpoint.blogspot.com)
Even the mighty Casey struck out
The analogy still holds. As you get closer to retirement, you’d be well advised to fine-tune your degree of aggressiveness as an investor. In truth, it’s a great idea to review your appetite for risk and how that translates to portfolio mix regularly, probably more so when we’re later in the cycle and the environment feels riskier. In a very real way, rocky markets help us better understand who we are as investors. We’re either comfortable or we are not. Listen to your inner voice. How do you feel right now? A great way to do this, in our experience, is to stop thinking about how much money you have and start speculating how much time you have. Once you’ve adjusted your thinking along those lines, then the following questions help you better understand who you are as an investor: “If all my long-term investments start losing value, how do I respond? Do I know my threshold for negative market movements? How is my short-term money positioned in terms of risk? If everything worsens in the coming months, do I have plan for covering my expenses?”
It quickly becomes apparent, then, how these questions change over time – not just in the actual number of months or years, but also in how strongly you respond to these questions. While you’re working and making money, you can shrug off a paper loss, even a sizable one, knowing that you still have years of productivity ahead of you to make up the shortfall. As you near retirement, not so much. With home and educational expenses winding down, you might actually be able to live comfortably much longer on your accrued cash than when you were in your most energetic years, but now it becomes imperative that you be able to.
It’s a team sport
When it comes to your retirement strategy, many people take on a player-manager role. Time for a history lesson.
The player-manager role was already a tradition in baseball when Connie Mack became one in 1894. Such legends as Leo Durocher, Mel Ott and Frank Robinson are among the dozens who share that distinction. So does Pete Rose but, regardless of whether he deserves a place in the Hall of Fame, he doesn’t deserve a place in any investment newsletter.
But even the most vibrant player-managers ultimately have to rely on their teammates. When picking investment vehicles, as on the field of play, a lot is left to chance. The best you can do is play the percentages and, through intellectually rigorous judgment, play those odds just a little bit better than the anyone else in the division.
For that, it’s important to check your gut feelings against the wisdom of your bench coach. Dalbar, a consultancy focused on the financial community, has made a name for itself with its signature Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior. Although the QAIB is updated annually, its results are pretty much constant: A lot of investor activity is utterly irrational. According to Dalbar, “psychological factors” account for half of all investor shortfalls.
This isn’t news. An entire academic discipline, behavioral economics, arose over the past three decades to explain why people are so short-sighted with their money. But Dalbar identifies nine specific quirks of human emotion that lead to much of the financial pain.
Primary among them is what’s called “herding,” which is exactly what it sounds like. If you’re just following the market, you shouldn’t be surprised if you find yourself buying high and selling low. This is followed by “loss aversion.” Many investors are so afraid of taking a loss on any one play that they’ll sell into a bear market. But even if they hold onto that asset until after the panic has subsided, they’re then more likely to keep it in their account and wait for it to “turn around.” They can handle the paper loss, perhaps, but they’ll be very resistant to actually taking less cash for it than they paid. These are the greatest challenges to the player-manager role in personal finance.
Emotional decision making is the same as an unforced error. And while unforced errors cannot be completely eradicated in the game of money management, they can be significantly reduced with good coaching from a team of professionals. So here’s the takeaway: Gather solid data, and rely on it. Modern baseball has moved on from the player-manager. We live in the age of sabermetrics, the statistical analysis made famous by the Michael Lewis book and Brad Pitt film Moneyball, and there isn’t a manager anywhere in the big leagues anymore who makes a move because “I got a hunch.”
Over time the game gets more serious. You are accumulating more wealth. You are nearing retirement. You are doing all you can to confidently prepare for a long and happy life. It’s the World Series of personal finance, and you’re in the playoffs, Champ! It’s not just about decisions but the decision-making process. Not everyone can handle the pressure on their own, and that’s where good coaching comes into play.